Rwanda Information Portal

Rwandan Minister answers question: how to measure “genocide ideology”

How do you measure “genocide ideology”? Don’t you think there are flaws in the genocide law?
This is the question journalis Kezio-Musoke asked Ms Louise Mushikiwabo, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Rwanda.
Here is her answer:

People say the law against Rwandans engaging in “genocide ideology” was put in place by President Paul Kagame’s regime to keep them from talking.

Rwandans have talked about genocide and what has happened in this country for the past 20 years non-stop. How does one create a law that fights racism, genocide and bigotry that is precise?

There is no precision in “ideology” whether you are in France, the United States, Poland, Holland or South Africa.

I have looked at 15 other countries with these laws and they are as vague as they can be. I have seen similar laws about the Holocaust and I have seen people from these countries saying we have vague laws.

They have things as vague as, “insulting the memory of the dead,” or “offending a group of people because of their sexual preference.” What precision is there in that law? How do you interpret it? How do you think a Rwandan judge will interpret it in a way that will stop people from expressing themselves?

Maybe it is the usage of the words “genocide denial,” “negating the genocide,” “divisionism” and “genocide ideology?”

But it is the same with these other laws. What we are looking out for in our society are those things that could take us back to what we witnessed in this country.

In some of these other countries, it was the Holocaust, bigotry, racist behaviour. You can’t make a difference in measuring the degree of these things, it is all vague.

People outside the country should know that Rwanda has moved on in terms of political concepts and mindsets.

[Source: The East African]

- If you want to receive per email, articles published on Rwandinfo in English, click here.
- If you want to receive Rwandinfo articles in English through your RSS Reader, click here.

1 comment

1 Rugamba Rukabu { 05.05.10 at 9:09 am }

Do you want to have an idea about “genocide ideology”?
- If one says that Hutus killed tutsis, this not genocide ideology, but if you say that tutsis killed hutus, this is a genocide ideology;
- if you say that the army is predominated by tutsis, this a genocide ideology, but if you say that the big majority of the former army was hutue, this not a genocide idelogy;
- if you say that in 1994, tutsis were killed because they were tutsis, this is not a genocide ideology, but if you dare say that hutus were killed because they were hutus, this a genocide ideology;
- if you sit in a cabaret and loudly say that hutus are bastard, this not a gnocide ideology, but if you dare say to your next and someone hears you saying “tutsis are bastard” immediately you are arrested for genocide ideology.

Briefly, any words relating the brutality, ruthless, savageness, cruaty, pityness of hutu towards tutsis is accepted like a pure truth, any aspect indicating that hutus mistreated tutsis during their reign is encouraged, whereas any words or conduct that show any wrong-doing by the tutsi community to hutus is interpreted like a genocide ideology.

So if you don’t want to be accused of genocide ideology, put in your head that Hutus are oppressors, tutsis are victims, hutu are devil, tutsis are angels otherwise the contrary is considered as “genocide ideology”.

Leave a Comment