Differences between Hitler’s Germany and Rwanda of 1994 — Rwandinfo_ENG
Rwanda Information Portal

Differences between Hitler’s Germany and Rwanda of 1994

As part of comments on the article U.S. “Lawyer Wrongly Arrested in Rwanda” written in the Huffingtonpost by Heidi Boghosian on May 28, Rukundo asked the question:

On a quick google glance, I have seen that he often puts the words Rwandan Genocide in quotation marks and talks about a cover-up. Are there other examples of Erlinder’s comments that deny that there was a Genocide in Rwanda? Or what are the specifics of the charges against Erlinder?

Depending on your response to the above questions, can you then explain what would happen to someone in Germany if they did the same as what Erlinder says about Rwanda? Would s/he be arrested there for denying the Genocide? Is there a difference in the Rwandan context?

Aimable reply:

Rukundo, I would like to publicly state the following differences between Hitler’s Germany and Rwanda of 1994:

1. The Jews in Germany have never enslaved Germans and never claimed that they were superior and born to rule over the German masses.
Some extremist Tutsis in Rwanda were an aristocratic minority that enslaved the Hutu peasant majority for over 400 years all the way until 1959. When the Hutu peasants asked for democracy the extremist Tutsis responded that the Hutu masses were inferior by birth and were born to be ruled by the superior Tutsi aristocrats.

2. The Jews in Germany have never started a war attacking Germany from a foreign country.
Some extremist Tutsis in Rwanda attacked the country from Uganda on October 1st, 1990. This was more than 5 times since 1960 that the extremist Tutsis had attacked the country.

3. The Jews in Germany did not spend a 4 year war fighting to gain power and in the process killing innocent German civilians.
Some extremist Tutsis in Rwanda fought since October 1990 until April 1994 fighting to gain power and in the process displaced 1 million civilians and killed thousands others, an example being on February 8, 1993 when the Tutsi extremists in the RPF killed 40 thousand unarmed civilians in Byumba and Ruhengeri.

4. The Jews in Germany did not kill the German president, together with the Austrian president, the Chief of Army and several high-ranking officials after they had signed a peace treaty with them.
Some extremist Tutsis in Rwanda killed the Hutu President of Rwanda, the Hutu President of Burundi, the Hutu Chief of Army and several high-ranking officials after they had signed a peace treaty with them.

5. The Jews in Germany did not follow the Germans into exile in neighboring countries and kill hundreds of thousands of them in forests like hunted animals.
Some extremist Tutsis in Rwanda bombed refugee camps in Zaire (now Democratic Republic of Congo) and chased the survivors into the forests of the Congo (DRC) where they butchered hundreds of thousands of them.

Therefore, I really think it is completely wrong to compare Hitler’s Germany to 1994 Rwanda.

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/heidi-boghosian/american-lawyer-wrongly-a_b_593630.html#comments.

Related:
Rwanda Circa 1994 is No Nazi Germany

– If you want to receive per email, articles published on Rwandinfo in English, click here.
– If you want to receive Rwandinfo articles in English through your RSS Reader, click here.

3 comments

1 susan phelps { 07.05.10 at 6:14 pm }

Yes I agre e with the above article.
One first should check in their dictionary the precise definition of GENOCIDE and then will understand that what happened in Rwanda 1990 to 1994 was not GENOCIDE but a country defending itself against an INVASION and its AGRESSORS !!!! But the word GENOCIDE has been used to CAMOUFLAGE the real reason behind the Rwandan tragedy. The U.S.A. trained,armed and financed the RPF and Paul Kagame to attack, terrorise and finally invade Rwanda . Why ????? the big question just to mention one COLTAN !!! and many more hidden reasons known to the US,UK,BELGUIM,FRANCE and so on and so .

2 Rwanda’s Prosecutor explains why Peter Erlinder has to be prosecuted | Rwandinfo_ENG { 07.06.10 at 4:06 am }

[…] Nevertheless, some still cite concerns for Erlinder’s rights to freedom of speech as a human being, questioning the justification of Rwanda’s strict anti-genocide laws which make it an offence to deny, minimise, attempt to justify or trivialise the events of April 1994. If the facts of the past aren’t made clear, they risk being repeated in the future. This risk is not hypothetical, it is very real: in November 2009, a UN report showed that the FDLR and other terrorist militarised groups in the Democratic Republic of the Congo depend more and more on political and material support from extremist and genocide deniers’ networks established in the West. Differences between Hitler’s Germany and Rwanda of 1994 […]

3 umutesi fridah { 07.19.10 at 11:57 pm }

you will be dessapointed

Leave a Comment